Skip to content

Course 4 · Lesson 7.2

Observation and context: what the text says and where it stands

10 minute read

Lessons in this course

Course 4 outline

Module 1: How the Canon Formed

  1. What a canon is, and what canonical means
  2. The Old Testament canon: Law, Prophets and Writings
  3. The New Testament canon: from gospels and letters to a list
  4. Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant canons compared

Module 2: The Hebrew Bible and the Septuagint

  1. The Hebrew Bible and the work of the Masoretes
  2. Origin and character of the Septuagint
  3. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the state of the Old Testament text
  4. How New Testament writers quote the Old Testament

Module 3: Transmission of the New Testament Text

  1. Copying by hand: papyri, codices and scribes
  2. Manuscript traditions: Alexandrian, Western and Byzantine texts
  3. Kinds of variants and how they arise
  4. The principles of textual criticism
  5. Reading a critical apparatus and a translation footnote

Module 4: Reading Responsibly: Exegesis and Method

  1. Exegesis and eisegesis with worked examples
  2. Source, form and redaction criticism: what each asks
  3. Strengths and limits of the historical method
  4. Literary and canonical reading

Module 5: Meaning Beyond the Surface: Typology, Allegory and Genre

  1. Typology in the New Testament and the fathers
  2. Allegory and its critics: Alexandria and Antioch
  3. Reading by genre: narrative, law, poetry, prophecy, gospel and letter
  4. Setting, authorship and audience as questions to ask of any passage

Module 6: Christian Approaches to Interpretation

  1. The fourfold sense of Scripture in the medieval church
  2. Reformation principles: Scripture, clarity and the grammatical and historical sense
  3. Orthodox and Catholic approaches: Scripture within Tradition
  4. Historical scholarship and theological interpretation in conversation

Module 7: Writing an Exegesis

  1. Choosing a passage and framing a question
  2. Observation and context: what the text says and where it stands
  3. Using commentaries and reference works without being led by them
  4. Writing up, checking conclusions and revising

All courses

Program / Course 4: Biblical Studies and Hermeneutics / Lesson 7.2

What you will learn

  • Make a careful list of observations about a passage before interpreting it.
  • Compare translations and note differences that affect the sense.
  • Describe a passage’s literary context and historical context.
  • Avoid common errors in studying words and in reading a passage out of its setting.

The big idea

Interpretation should rest on observation. Before asking what a passage means, a careful reader asks what it says: the words, the order, the repetitions, the connections between the sentences. Then the reader asks where it stands: in its paragraph, its book and its world. Most mistakes in exegesis come from skipping this stage. A patient list of observations, tested against two or three translations and set within its context, gives the later steps firm ground.

Key terms

Observation
The careful noting of what is actually in the text, such as its words, structure and tone, before explaining it.
Literary context
The setting of a passage in the text around it, from the nearby verses to the book as a whole.
Historical context
The setting of a passage in the history, culture and circumstances of its author and first audience.
Connective
A small word that links parts of an argument, such as therefore, for, but, so that. Connectives show how the writer’s thought moves.
Word study
A study of a word’s meaning by looking at how it is used in the author’s writing and its time.
Semantic range
The set of meanings a word can carry. In any one use, context selects one.
Parallel passage
Another passage with similar wording, subject or event, which may illuminate the one under study.

Background

Observation is a skill that can be learned, like noticing details in a painting. People who read the Bible often read quickly for the main point, or read what they expect to find. Slow reading reveals more. A passage that seemed plain begins to show a structure, a mood or a surprising turn.

Context is the second discipline. A sentence taken from a letter, a speech or a story can mean something quite different from what it means in its place. Interpreters distinguish the literary context, which is the surrounding text, from the historical context, which is the world in which the text was written. Both limit what a passage can mean.

This lesson gives a practical procedure. It does not require Hebrew or Greek, though it will mention what those languages add. You will need a notebook, two or three translations, and access to a good introduction to the book you are studying.

Step-by-step explanation

Step 1: Read slowly and list what you see

Read the passage at least three times, aloud if you can. Then make a list. Note who speaks and to whom. Note the actions, the places and the times. Note words and phrases that repeat, contrasts, comparisons, questions, commands and promises. Note the connectives, since they show the logic. In Romans 12:1, Paul writes, “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice.” The word therefore points back to the long argument of Romans 1 to 11. A reader who skips it misses that the call to sacrifice rests on the mercies described.

Try also to outline the passage in a few lines, giving each section a heading in your own words. If you cannot outline it, you have probably not understood its shape yet. Mark what surprises you, since surprise often marks something important.

Step 2: Compare translations

Read the passage in at least three English translations that differ in method. Some aim at word for word fidelity, some at thought for thought clarity, and some are paraphrases. Note every place where they differ in a way that affects the sense. Check any footnote that mentions a variant reading or an alternative translation. The differences do not tell you which is right, but they show you where the decisions lie and where you should look more closely.

Resist the temptation to treat one translation as the original. Every translation is an interpretation, and each balances accuracy against readability. Comparing is the cure.

Step 3: Study the literary context

Work outward in circles. Read the paragraph before and after. Then read the whole chapter and the whole book, or at least a summary of it. Ask how the passage fits the movement of the book. Is it an opening, a turning point, a conclusion? Look at the book’s genre and purpose. Finally, ask where the passage stands in the canon, and whether other passages quote it, echo it or explain it.

Be careful with word studies. A word does not carry all its possible meanings into every use. The scholar James Barr warned in 1961 against taking a root meaning or a list of senses and loading them into a single occurrence. Ask how the author uses the word in this book and in this sentence, and consult a lexicon only to see the range, not to choose the sense you prefer.

Step 4: Study the historical context

Ask who wrote the passage, to whom, when and why. Gather what can be known of the place, the customs and the events that the passage assumes. Use an introduction to the book, a Bible dictionary and, for later steps, commentaries. Mark clearly what is well supported and what is disputed. For example, the date of Daniel or the destination of Galatians is argued, and your study should say so.

Finally, look at parallel passages. Another gospel may tell the same story differently. Another letter may treat the same subject. These comparisons often raise the questions that your study should answer. Write them in the notebook and leave the answers for later.

  1. What does the passage say, in my own words, verse by verse?
  2. Which words, phrases or structures repeat?
  3. What do the connectives show about the logic?
  4. Where do the translations differ in ways that affect the sense?
  5. How does the passage fit into its book?
  6. What do I know and not know about the historical setting?

Examples

Therefore in Romans 12

A reader who notes the therefore at the start of Romans 12 and traces it back sees that Paul’s appeal to give oneself to God is based on the mercies he has described in the eleven chapters before. The observation turns a general call to dedication into a response to grace.

Translation differences

In Psalm 23:4, the King James Version has the valley of the shadow of death, while many modern translations have the darkest valley or a valley of deep darkness. The Hebrew word can be read either way, and scholars debate. Noticing the difference alerts the reader to a decision and invites a closer look.

A word study done carefully

A student studies the Greek word for love in a passage and finds a popular claim that one word always means divine love and another word human love. She checks how the author uses the words in the same book and finds that they overlap. She concludes that context, not the word alone, shows the sense. The care avoids a common error.

Different perspectives

Protestant

Protestant guides to Bible study, from the Reformers to the present, stress careful observation of the plain sense in its context, with the aid of grammar and history. The principle that Scripture interprets Scripture drives the habit of tracing connections to other passages.

Catholic

Catholic teaching asks interpreters to attend to the literary forms and the circumstances of the time and place, as the Second Vatican Council taught, and to read within the whole canon and the tradition. Lectio divina, the slow prayerful reading of a passage, includes a stage of careful attention to the text.

Orthodox

Orthodox students value the fathers’ close reading of words and phrases, as in the sermons of Chrysostom, and read the text as it is used in worship. Modern Orthodox scholars also use historical and literary tools to understand the context.

Jewish

Jewish study has long attended closely to the words, to repeated terms and to small differences in wording. The tradition of commentary values the question of why this word and not another. These habits are useful models for all readers.

Academic

Scholars emphasize the discipline of separating observation from interpretation, and the use of semantic and discourse analysis. They also stress that any claim about the historical context should rest on evidence, and that gaps in evidence should be marked.

Why it matters

Everything else in the course depends on this stage. A student who has observed carefully will find the commentaries easier to use and easier to question. A student who has skipped it will be led by whichever author is read first. The habit also makes ordinary reading richer, since a passage that has been looked at closely is more likely to surprise and to teach.

Common misunderstandings

Misunderstanding: Observation is just reading the passage once.

Correction: Observation means slow, repeated reading with a list of what is actually there. Most readers see much more on the third reading than the first.

Misunderstanding: A Greek or Hebrew word study will tell me what a passage means.

Correction: A word has a range of meanings, and context chooses among them. Word studies help only when they ask how the author uses the word.

Misunderstanding: Historical context can be assumed from general knowledge.

Correction: The historical context must be supported by evidence. Marking what is certain and what is guessed is part of honest study.

Misunderstanding: One good translation is enough.

Correction: Comparing translations reveals decisions and difficulties that a single translation can hide.

Knowledge check

Why is observation distinguished from interpretation?

Observation records what is actually in the text, such as words, structure, repetitions and connectives, before explaining it. Keeping it separate guards against reading in ideas and gives interpretation firm evidence to build on.

What does the connective therefore in Romans 12:1 show?

It shows that Paul’s appeal to offer oneself to God rests on the argument of the preceding chapters about God’s mercies. The observation links the practical appeal to the doctrinal argument.

What is the difference between literary and historical context?

Literary context is the surrounding text, from the nearby verses to the whole book and the canon. Historical context is the world in which the text was written, including its author, audience, customs and events. Both limit what a passage can mean.

What error did James Barr warn against in word studies?

He warned against loading all the possible meanings or the root meaning of a word into a single occurrence. The sense in a given place is chosen by context, so one asks how the author uses the word here.

Think it through

  1. When you read the Bible, how quickly do you move to meaning, and what do you skip?
  2. What does comparing translations show you about the choices translators make?
  3. How might the context of a famous verse change your picture of it?
  4. What would you do if you could not find reliable information about the historical context?

Independent assignment

An observation sheet

For your chosen passage, make an observation sheet in your notebook. List speakers, actions, places, times, repeated words, contrasts, questions, commands and connectives. Write a brief outline. Copy the passage from three translations and mark differences that affect the sense. Then write 150 to 250 words on the literary context and 150 to 250 words on the historical context, marking what is certain and what is disputed. Do not yet consult commentaries. Keep your work in your notebook.

Further study